Discussion about this post

User's avatar
[redacted]'s avatar

This episode really hit hard for me. I lost a friend to an accidental Fentanyl overdose last February -- at least that's what the coroner's report said. She left two kids behind, one of them with special needs.

She had already OD'd once before after smoking Fentanyl-laced marijuana, but she survived. She was furious with her dealer and cut ties with him (his response was, "Wait, you didn't want it with Fentanyl??"). I guess her new dealer was worse.

I appreciate the thoughtfulness and curiosity you brought to this two-part series. I'll have to listen to it carefully again because I've been wondering the same thing -- why kill your customers?

As previous commenters have said, Search Engine fills a gaping hole that Reply All used to fill, even though they're two different podcasts. Perhaps you could invite Alex onto the show sometime? 😉

Expand full comment
Andrew's avatar

This ep was very good, no question. Anyone who loved it - no argument from me. But if you look at whatever stats you have (new listeners, subscribers, etc., over time), and if you can discern which episodes are helping add or retain listeners and which are stalling or reversing the (hopefully) upward trend: I'm curious about the effects of this two-parter. IMO it's possible to say, simultaneously, (a) this was a well-made, moving, novel look at an important topic, and also (b) listening felt like work, and providing this kind of work might not be the most novel and valuable thing that Search Engine can do.

Of course some would find that take shallow, unfeeling, irresponsible. Ok. But I submit that in the current culture we are all bombarded with an infinite supply of important, valuable information about tragic occurrences, social ills that deserve attention and action, grim phenomena that aren't well understood. Individually, all these topics merit our attention. In the aggregate, they overwhelm, they foster despair, they enervate instead of inspiring action. We haven't figured out how to regulate the inflow of all the world's ills.

I know this show can't be Reply All, can't resolve the feeling of loss many of us had when that show imploded. I have no doubt there are powerful personal & emotional reasons that's true (for PJ and Sruthi) as well as creative and logistical reasons. But you can't ignore the fact that a lot of your listeners are here partly because of what that show gave us. In a very grim time, Reply All did real good, in a very unique way, by injecting humor, camaraderie, and a sense of adventurous curiosity about the world, into any day when an episode dropped. That is a very valuable contribution for a podcast to make to listeners' lives, and I'd argue it's a kind of contribution that's in shorter supply than thoughtful, intimate journalism about the grave social ills that permeate the news, social media, and the running background music in many of our brains.

Just one opinion. Check the numbers! And regardless, I hope the show continues to do well.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts